Shuunnya Care
Herbal Fluoride-Free Toothpaste
The three herbs are 1.9 percent of the tube. The other 98.1 percent is an ordinary base, and there is no fluoride.
₹210
₹250
-16%Inclusive of all taxes
Pack: 100 g tube
₹210
100 g tube
The Shuunnya promise
A clean fluoride-free paste for people who have made that choice, with the herbal fraction given as a number and the loss of fluoride stated before anything else.
- No fluoride, and the roughly 24 percent prevented fraction it gives up
- The three named herbs are 1.9 percent of the tube, the base an ordinary one
- Eugenol declared at about 0.33 percent, from the clove oil, not hidden
- Abrasivity RDA 82 by ISO 11609, higher than the silica tube's 68
Quality & reports
Shuunnya VerifiedIndependent quality and lab reports for this product — download to verify.
- Fluoride Screening, Not Detected, and Herbal Marker Assay by HPLC for Azadirachtin and Eugenol Lab report · NABL-accredited Cosmetics Testing Laboratory, Pune · 2026-06 Download
- Relative Dentin Abrasivity by the Radiotracer Method, ISO 11609, RDA 82 Lab report · NABL-accredited Cosmetics Testing Laboratory, Pune · 2026-06 Download
- Heavy Metals by ICP-MS on the Herbal Inputs, Lead, Arsenic, Mercury and Cadmium Lab report · NABL-accredited Cosmetics Testing Laboratory, Pune · 2026-06 Download
Details
This tube exists for people who have decided to go without fluoride, and who deserve a clean, plainly labelled option rather than a shelf of coloured gel. Fifteen names on the INCI list, all below with percentages. The first thing to say is the thing this listing exists to say. Fluoride is the single best-evidenced measure against tooth decay there is. The pooled Cochrane estimate across dozens of children's trials puts the prevented fraction at about 24 percent against a non-fluoride paste. This tube has none. That is a real loss and it is not a safety upgrade, and we are not going to let the word herbal imply that it is one. If nobody has told you to avoid fluoride, buy our daily fluoride toothpaste instead. It is Rs 20 cheaper and it is the better product for almost everybody. The second thing is what herbal means here, because on this shelf it is the word most exposed to the biggest cheat in Indian personal care. Natural, herbal and ayurvedic are unregulated words, and they are routinely printed on a conventional synthetic base with a fraction of a percent of a plant extract stirred in for the label. So here is the number. Neem leaf extract 1.0 percent, miswak extract 0.5 percent, clove bud oil 0.4 percent. That is 1.9 percent. The remaining 98.1 percent is sorbitol, water, calcium carbonate, hydrated silica, glycerin, xylitol, cellulose gum and a coconut-derived surfactant, which is the same base a conventional toothpaste uses. Herbal describes 1.9 percent of this product. Printing that number is the difference between a description and a marketing word, and the honest thing to add is that the antibacterial activity of neem, clove and miswak is a laboratory observation and not a demonstrated caries result comparable to fluoride's. The third is the clove. Clove bud oil is roughly 82 percent eugenol, and eugenol is one of the 26 fragrance components the EU makes declarable. So it is declared, at 0.33 percent, rather than folded into the word herbal.
- Full INCI, in descending order: Sorbitol, Aqua, Calcium Carbonate, Hydrated Silica, Glycerin, Xylitol, Azadirachta Indica (Neem) Leaf Extract, Cellulose Gum, Sodium Cocoyl Glutamate, Salvadora Persica (Miswak) Extract, Eugenia Caryophyllus (Clove) Bud Oil, Eugenol, Mentha Piperita (Peppermint) Oil, Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice, Limonene
- With percentages: Sorbitol 34.0, Aqua 27.6, Calcium Carbonate 15.0, Hydrated Silica 10.0, Glycerin 6.0, Xylitol 3.0, Neem Leaf Extract 1.0, Cellulose Gum 1.0, Sodium Cocoyl Glutamate 1.0, Miswak Extract 0.5, Clove Bud Oil 0.4, Peppermint Oil 0.3, Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice 0.2, which is 100.0. Eugenol at about 0.33 and limonene at about 0.01 are constituents of the two oils rather than separate additions, and are declared for that reason
- The 1 percent line falls after the sodium cocoyl glutamate. Neem, cellulose gum and the surfactant sit exactly on it
- No fluoride, stated on the front of the pack and in the name, not implied by omission
- The herbs total 1.9 percent, and the base is a conventional one. Herbal is a description of 1.9 percent of the tube
- Eugenol declared at about 0.33 percent, as a constituent of the clove bud oil. It is one of the 26 EU declarable fragrance components and it is also what makes clove taste of clove
- Abrasivity RDA 82, by the radiotracer method to ISO 11609, against the standard's ceiling of 250. Higher than our fluoride tube's 68, because calcium carbonate is a harder abrasive than silica
- Measured pH 9.2, alkaline, because calcium carbonate is alkaline. Enamel demineralises below about pH 5.5, so alkaline is not a problem for teeth. It does taste chalkier
- No SLS. Replaced by sodium cocoyl glutamate at 1.0 percent, which foams less
- No titanium dioxide, so the paste is off-white to pale beige, which is the neem and the clove
- No preservative, and the claim holds: 34 percent sorbitol and 6 percent glycerin put the water activity below what bacteria and moulds need
- No triclosan, no saccharin, no aspartame, no dyes, no plastic microbeads, no charcoal
- Honest trade-off one: the missing fluoride, which is the largest trade-off on this entire shelf and is stated first rather than last
- Honest trade-off two: xylitol at 3.0 percent is here for sweetness, not as a substitute active. The caries evidence for xylitol comes from 6 to 10 g a day in gum, and a pea of paste holds about 0.03 g. It does not replace what the fluoride would have done
- Honest trade-off three: it tastes strongly of clove, and clove is a taste people either want or cannot stand. There is no way to make a clove paste taste mild
- Honest trade-off four: at RDA 82 with a chalk abrasive, this is more abrasive than the silica tube. Still low by the standard, and worth knowing if you brush hard or have exposed dentine
Product information
Full ingredient list, INCI, in descending order
- Full INCI
- Sorbitol, Aqua, Calcium Carbonate, Hydrated Silica, Glycerin, Xylitol, Azadirachta Indica (Neem) Leaf Extract, Cellulose Gum, Sodium Cocoyl Glutamate, Salvadora Persica (Miswak) Extract, Eugenia Caryophyllus (Clove) Bud Oil, Eugenol, Mentha Piperita (Peppermint) Oil, Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice, Limonene
- Sorbitol
- 34.0 percent, humectant
- Aqua
- 27.6 percent, purified to IP grade
- Calcium Carbonate
- 15.0 percent, the main abrasive. It is also why this paste could not carry fluoride even if we wanted it to, because calcium binds free fluoride ion
- Hydrated Silica
- 10.0 percent, second abrasive and thickener
- Glycerin
- 6.0 percent
- Xylitol
- 3.0 percent, for sweetness. Not a substitute active, and the trade-off row below says why
- Azadirachta Indica Leaf Extract
- 1.0 percent, neem
- Cellulose Gum
- 1.0 percent, binder
- Sodium Cocoyl Glutamate
- 1.0 percent, the surfactant, and what replaced the SLS
- The 1 percent line
- Falls exactly here, with the neem, the binder and the surfactant on it. Below this point the legal order carries no dose information, which is precisely why the herbal percentages are stated separately
- Salvadora Persica Extract
- 0.5 percent, miswak
- Eugenia Caryophyllus Bud Oil
- 0.4 percent, clove bud
- Eugenol
- About 0.33 percent. A constituent of the clove bud oil, which is roughly 82 percent eugenol, not a separate addition. It is one of the 26 fragrance components the EU makes declarable, so it is declared
- Mentha Piperita Oil
- 0.3 percent, peppermint, with limonene at about 0.01 percent as its declarable constituent
- Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice
- 0.2 percent
- The herbal total
- Neem 1.0 plus miswak 0.5 plus clove bud oil 0.4 is 1.9 percent. The other 98.1 percent is an ordinary toothpaste base
- The sum
- 34.0 plus 27.6 plus 15.0 plus 10.0 plus 6.0 plus 3.0 plus 1.0 plus 1.0 plus 1.0 plus 0.5 plus 0.4 plus 0.3 plus 0.2 is 100.0
What is left out, what that costs, and what herbal actually covers
- Fluoride
- None, which is the point of this tube and also its largest cost. Fluoride is the best-evidenced measure against tooth decay there is, with a pooled Cochrane prevented fraction of about 24 percent in children's trials against a non-fluoride paste. Nothing in here replaces that, and no ingredient in here is claimed to
- What herbal covers
- 1.9 percent of the tube. Natural, herbal and ayurvedic are unregulated words in India and are routinely printed over a conventional synthetic base. The base here is sorbitol, water, calcium carbonate, silica, glycerin, xylitol, cellulose gum and a coconut surfactant, and that is 98.1 percent of it
- What the herbs actually do
- Neem, clove and miswak show antibacterial activity in laboratory work. That is not the same as a demonstrated reduction in cavities, and we will not present it as one
- SLS
- None. Replaced by sodium cocoyl glutamate at 1.0 percent, which foams noticeably less
- Titanium dioxide
- None, and nothing replaced it. The paste is off-white to pale beige, which is the neem and the clove showing
- Preservative
- None, and honestly so. 34 percent sorbitol with 6 percent glycerin puts the water activity below what microorganisms need
- Also absent
- Triclosan, saccharin, aspartame, sucralose, dyes, plastic microbeads, charcoal, and any whitening abrasive
- Not fragrance-free
- Clove and peppermint oils at 0.7 percent between them, with eugenol and limonene declared. A flavour is a fragrance and calling it herbal does not change that
How to use it, who it suits, and the tube beside it
- Buy the other tube if
- Nobody has specifically told you to avoid fluoride. The daily fluoride toothpaste is Rs 20 cheaper and it is the better product for almost everybody. This is not modesty, it is where the evidence sits
- Buy this one if
- You have decided against fluoride, or a dentist has advised it for a particular reason. In that case you should have a well-made tube rather than a badly made one
- Either way
- Two minutes, twice a day, matters more than which of these two tubes is in your hand
- Abrasivity
- RDA 82 by the radiotracer method to ISO 11609. Still low against the standard's ceiling of 250, and higher than the silica tube's 68 because chalk is the harder abrasive. Worth knowing if you brush hard or have exposed dentine
- Measured pH
- 9.2, alkaline, because calcium carbonate is. Enamel demineralises below about pH 5.5, so alkaline is safe for teeth. It does taste chalkier than a silica paste
- Taste
- Strongly clove-forward, with peppermint behind it. Clove is a taste people either want or cannot tolerate, and there is no mild version of it
- Amount and frequency
- A pea, about 0.25 g, twice a day for two minutes. For children under six a rice-grain smear and supervised brushing, as with any toothpaste
- Net weight
- 100 g per tube, checked by net-weight audit per lot
- Cost per tube
- Rs 210 single and Rs 190 in the pack of three, which is Rs 2.10 and Rs 1.90 per gram. About 400 brushings per tube
- Pack
- Recyclable mono-material laminate tube, no aluminium layer
- Shelf life
- 24 months
- Regulator
- A cosmetic under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act 1940 and the Cosmetics Rules 2020, governed by CDSCO. Abrasivity and herbal marker assays at a NABL-accredited laboratory, by ISO 11609 and the methods in IS 6356
Ratings & reviews
Loading reviews...
More in Beauty & Personal Care
View allShuunnya Care
Barrier Balm for Very Dry Skin
Seven ingredients, no water, no preservative, and a straight answer about what leaving petrolatum out costs you.
Options available
Shuunnya Care
Clarifying Face Wash for Oily Skin
Salicylic acid 1.0 percent at a measured pH 4.0, which is 8.5 percent free acid, and that sum is on the page.
Options available
Shuunnya Care
Cold-Pressed Coconut Hair Oil
One ingredient, pressed not refined: free fatty acid 0.12 percent and peroxide value 0.8.
Options available
Shuunnya Care
Cotton Top Sanitary Pads
A 100 percent cotton top sheet, not cotton-feel, absorbency in grams to IS 5405, every layer named, plastics too.
Options available